Intellivy pricing: cheap per-respondent testing, and a domain move worth knowing about

The domain move, stated first because it changes what you'll find searching

intellivy.com redirects to intellivy.net. That is worth leading with because a search for “Intellivy pricing” can surface old cached content or confuse the company with Intellezy, an entirely unrelated training company that shows up in the same searches. Link and bookmark the .net domain; anything referencing the .com as a live, separate site is out of date.

The actual tiers

Read from intellivy.net/pricing on 21 August 2026, in US dollars:

• Free plan — pay-as-you-go, from $1 per respondent.
• Pro — $39.99/month, respondents from $0.90 each.
• Business — $249.99/month, respondents from $0.75 each, with a dedicated account manager.
• Enterprise — custom-quoted.

The structure rewards volume the same way a bulk discount would: the per-respondent cost drops as the monthly plan price rises, from $1 on the free tier down to $0.75 on Business. There is no Trustpilot or G2 record for Intellivy that we could verify — state that as a finding about an under-reviewed category rather than guessing at a score.

What Intellivy actually tests, across the product lifecycle

Intellivy runs Amazon-focused consumer research panels at every stage of a product's life — concept testing before you manufacture anything, launch validation once a listing exists, and ongoing optimization testing as you iterate. That lifecycle framing is the genuine differentiator against a single-purpose polling tool: the same panel mechanics get reused from the earliest product decision through the listing you eventually ship, at a lower per-respondent cost than most of its category.

That reuse is worth spelling out concretely: the same panel infrastructure that validates a product concept before a single unit is manufactured can, months later, test the finished listing's main image against a challenger — no new vendor relationship, no new account to set up, just a continuation of the same testing habit at a later stage.

What a per-respondent price does not include

Like every polling tool in this category, Intellivy prices the vote, not the thing being voted on. A respondent gives feedback on a concept, image or listing draft you already have in hand — producing that concept in the first place is a separate cost sitting entirely outside Intellivy's pricing page. For a brand still at the concept stage, that upstream cost might be a prototype or a mockup; for a brand testing a listing, it's the copy, images and video that would otherwise need a designer, a copywriter, or a dedicated production tool.

Worth stating plainly rather than skipping past: a brand with no testing budget at all, running purely on instinct for what a listing should look like, is the actual failure mode Intellivy and its category exist to fix. The gap between 'we think this image will work' and '50 real shoppers preferred it 34 to 16, and here is why' is the entire value of the category, and it is worth the modest monthly cost even at the lowest testing volume.

A worked example: what a monthly testing budget actually buys

Take the Pro tier: $39.99/month plus $0.90 per respondent. Running three separate concept tests in a month — say a main image, a bullet rewrite, and a video thumbnail, each shown to 50 respondents — costs $39.99 in base fee plus 150 respondents at $0.90, or $135.00, for $174.99 total. That's three genuine rounds of real shopper feedback in a month, not one, which is the actual value the per-respondent model is selling: cheap enough per test that testing becomes routine instead of a rare, expensive event reserved for a launch.

Scale that up to Business — $249.99/month plus $0.75 per respondent — and the same three 50-respondent rounds cost $249.99 plus $112.50, or $362.49, more in total but cheaper per respondent, which only pays off once testing volume is high enough that the lower per-unit rate outweighs the higher base fee. The break-even math is simple: Business beats Pro once monthly respondent volume clears roughly 1,400 — the point where the $0.15-per-respondent saving has recovered the $210 gap in base fee — so at typical concept-testing volumes, Pro is the honest default and Business only earns its fee at genuinely heavy, agency-level testing cadence.

Where Intellivy sits against the wider polling category

Intellivy is one of three Amazon-adjacent research and polling tools worth knowing about, and the honest comparison is on structure, not a ranking. PickFu runs pay-as-you-go from $1 per response with a $99/month PickFu+ tier carrying matching credit, and holds a strong G2 record — 4.8 from 111 reviews — though its Trustpilot count (3 reviews) is too small to cite as anything but a curiosity. ProductPinion runs Amazon-specific research — polls, video shop-alongs, and search-result simulations against real Amazon shoppers — starting at $57/month for 50 responses, with no verifiable public rating on either Trustpilot or G2.

Intellivy's genuine differentiator against both is the lifecycle framing: the same panel mechanics carry from concept testing before manufacturing through launch and ongoing optimization, rather than a single-purpose creative poll. A brand still deciding what to build is better served starting there than with a tool built purely for finished-listing A/B tests. A brand that already has a product and just wants fast, high-confidence votes on two finished images is often better served by PickFu's response speed or ProductPinion's Amazon-specific shopper context. None of the three makes the thing being tested — that upstream step sits outside every polling tool's pricing page, ours included on the production side.

Where a lifecycle-testing tool and a production tool fit together

Dr. CRO generates the listing-stage material a tool like Intellivy would test: versioned copy with an Amazon draft preview, image stacks built to a blueprint from product-truth reference photos, and 15-second video with a human-approved storyboard. It is not a research or polling tool and does not compete with Intellivy's lifecycle panels — it produces candidates fast enough to make repeated rounds of concept testing practical rather than expensive.

Across 1,693 ASINs with 500+ sessions on 45 brands we manage (US, Feb–Aug 2026), median unit-session conversion is 7.2%, with the gap between a listing's best and worst version inside the same account running tenfold — 30.9% against 3.1%. Testing more real candidates against real shoppers, cheaply, is exactly what Intellivy's per-respondent pricing is built to make affordable — pairing it with a faster production line is the honest way to close that gap. Dr. CRO is a product of Full Circle, a full-service Amazon management company with $500M+ in managed revenue across 100+ brands. The first 30 days run free, Orbit is included, and the production line itself is priced on the call once catalogue size is known — a genuinely different pricing shape from Intellivy's per-respondent model, and worth naming as such rather than forcing the two onto the same scale.

A brand evaluating whether to add testing to an existing workflow at all — rather than which specific tool to use — should weigh it against the cost of guessing wrong after a listing goes live: a main image that underperforms for a month before anyone notices costs far more in lost conversion than a testing round would have, using the worked Pro-tier arithmetic above as a reference point.